Republican Congressman Tom Price, Chairman of the House Conservatives Caucus, has introduced a new proposal this month, HR3400. This bill, called The Empowering Patientâ€™s First Act, grants all Americans quality health care with options chosen by the patient and the caring physician or healthcare provider.
Its main ideology supports:
- Flexibility in offered benefits by employers and protects employer-sponsored insurance
- Greater patient choice
- Coverage of pre-existing conditions
- Expansion of pooling groups for insurance purchase
- Physician reimbursement for maintaining healthy patient care including preventative care and wellness/prevention programs
- Medical liability reform to decrease defensive medicine, cutting out waste and duplication.
At a time when Britainâ€™s National Health Service is being modified to rid 45% administrative costs, we should recognize the financial burden this would put on our system and nip these incurred costs at its inception.
Supporting this bill puts not only healthcare availability in the hands of the public, it puts the decision power for the healthcare where in squarely belongsâ€”in the hands of the patient, not some autocrat who will make the decisions based on cost considerations.
The problem with EMR implementation is dealing with the merge between treatment and technology for the doctors. They are having a hard time combining the EMR and are blocking or misusing the EMR.
I still see doctors using paper charts with their EMR. That is not how it is supposed to work. They are creating more issues and more steps.
Helping doctors meet meaningful use is easy for the EMR companies but not for the doctors. The problem is that consulting does not combine treatment and EMR.
The American medical industry is going through a change of how patients are cared for. Weâ€™re moving from diagnosing a problem when it comes up, to moving to a preventive medicine culture.
The key is teaching and consulting with the physicians to combine their human manual process with the EMR.
The problem is that a lot of the EMR companiesâ€™ software is not flexible. EMR software needs to allow the medical practices, clinics or hospitals to merge their work-flow (human manual treatment process) around the technology. They should not have to change their process. Very few EMR software companies allow this.
Software should be built around the doctorsâ€™ workflow treatment of their patients.
One big issue is with CCHIT or others trying to enter the certification market. Certification needs to have a defined process on workflow and how it evolves around practices, clinics and hospitals. It doesn’t set a base on how the software should meet needs of the physicians.
Hopefully in time and maturity of the market we will see the combining of treatment and technology like the orthodontist and dental market.
This article was submitted by a guest today- Ed Brown
Eddie Brown isÂ President of EA Brown & Associates VAR for MedComsys IPatientCare EHR. He has over 17 years of experience selling document management, messaging, document capture and transaction management solutions and enterprise solutions for the banking, insurance and health care vertical markets. P:404-667-5006
Surprisingly, at a time when Berwick, Â the new appointed head of CMS (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services) states that he greatly admires England’s National Health Service, England is going to decentralize theirs!
In a new surprising and radical move, Britain’s new coalition government has remarked that it will revamp their healthcare system which has been in place since 1948. Â Although exact details have as yet to be disclosed, England plans to shift its $160 billion yearly health budget away from a centralized bureaucracy to physicians at the local level. Â Family physicians will receive the money to buy services from hospitals and other healthcare providers.
By effecting this change, the government can save up to 45% in administrative costs. Â A representative stated “Liberating the N.H.S. and putting power in the hands of patients and clinicians means we will be able to effect a radical simplification and remove layers of management.”
Andrew Lansley, the health secretary also vowed to empower the patients. Rather than decisions left to primary care trusts, the patients themselves will now be able to decide where they will receive their exams and treatments Â which will also decrease the length of waits for their medical care.
Steve Field, chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners, states “This is about clinicians taking responsibility for making these decisions.”. “It will be able to focus on what local people need”.
Until now “there were far too many bureaucratic hurdles to leap” in the system and “in many places, the communication between G.P.s and consultants in hospitals has become fragmented and distant” according to Dr. Richard Vautrey, depty chairman of the general practitioner committee at the British Medical Association.
The change facilitates the shift to privatization of healthcare. Isn’t it ironic that the system of care that We used to have, is the best one after all?!
It has been proposed that 3rd party systems who had been exempt from HIPAA, like billing companies, customer service contractors and others who received patient information, should be held accountable at the same degree as hospitals and healthcare providers. Violation of privacy rules would subject them to fines.
This is not just a slap on the wrist. HHS increased the maximum penalty for violations to $50,000 per violation and $1.5 million per year.
The Office for Civil Rightâ€™s regulatory power over HIPAAâ€™s privacy would be strengthened by this proposal along with greater accessibility for personal data to people.
According to David Blumenthal, the National Coordinator of Health IT, â€œThis rulemaking will strengthen the privacy and seurity of health information, and is an integral piece of the administrationâ€™s efforts to broaden the use of health information technology in healthcare todayâ€.
Additionally, the new proposal restricts personal information disclosures to health plans.
Change to current security practices would encourage more people to submit their information to personal health records and pave the way to improved or greater usage of information on electronic health systems as we move forward in the digital realm of medical practice.
Red Flag Delay
Yes, you have read this before- four other times before as a matter of fact.
This is the fifth time that the FTC announced a delay in enforcement of the Red Flags rule, changing the compliance deadline from June 1 to Dec.31.
As you may recall, the Red Flag rule designates doctorâ€™s practices and other small businesses as creditors, thereby requiring them to submit identity theft and prevention strategies in writing. This would pertain to all offices that bill patients, so that it seems the office is extending credit to the patients.
The purpose of the delay is to allow lawmakers time to consider proposed legislation that woud exempt small businesses including doctorâ€™s offices with fewer than 20 employees from the Red Flag rule. This is also in response to the law suit filed by the AMA, AOA and the Medical Society for the District of Columbia.
What are your thoughts? Â Don’t you agree that owing your copay for a medical visit is not really like the physician’s office giving you a “loan” even though it may be the case in the strictest sense of the law?
We have often seen that for many businesses, when following a code of ethics translates to losing money, their mantra is “there is no ethics in business”.
Apparently this is what Glaxo- Smith-Klein subscribes to. Â In doing their comparison study between Avandia and Actos for diabetes, the Â cardiovascular risk and death came to light. Â Instead of pulling the drug or at least warning the public, they spent their efforts on trying to hush up the information. Â Countless lives have been lost so that GSK can realize millions of dollars.
But the scariest thing is not even this mantra. It’s the stance that the FDA is taking. Â Yes, the FDA, the arm of the government that we place our faith in- the one that approves drugs so that we can assume they are safe to take.
The FDA is debating whether to withdraw Avandia from the market because for those (that don’t die) there is some benefit. This is the belief of Dr. John Jenkins, director of the FDA’s office of new drugs, according to documents.
Criticized by the FDA for suggesting that the public should be warned about the risk in a stronger fashion, Dr. Rosemary Johann-Liang, formerly the supervisor in the drug safety office of FDA, states “This should not happen, and the fact that these kind of things happen, I think people have to make a determination about the leadership at the FDA”.
I agree. Â Don’t you? Â Let’s hear a public outcry about the fact that a debate even takes place. It can start with you!
Let’s vote to bring in ethics!
Congressional fireworks have been averted while away for the 4th of July holiday.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) just got a new head. Dr. Donald Berwick, a pediatrician and leading promoter of patient safety and quality improvement in healthcare was just appointed to the post of Administrator. Â Turns out, Dr. Berwick can be appointed by the President who sidesteps normal procedure of a Senate confirmation process.
The loophole that most people are unaware of, is that during the time that the Senate is in recess (like the 4th of July holiday), the President can appoint who he wants without approval, avoiding the traditional route.
Normally, the Senate Finance Committee would have conducted a hearing on the nomination involving questions from supporters and critics after which the nomination report would go to the full Senate for a vote.
Supporters feel that Dr. Berwick is a natural choice to help implement the healthcare reform legislation, having been CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement which has helped healthcare providers and facilities to improve patient care. Â Critics (like Senate Republicans) blast Dr. Berwick as a supporter of healthcare rationing and socialized medicine. They feel that he is being “snuck” in without explaining his position on national health service or medical rationing. As he is to take office imminently, we will find out how he feels about these issues first hand.
Happy 4th of July to everyone.
While we are enjoying the beach or a family barbeque, let us remember our countrymen in the military and how they are fighting for us. Â Let us also rejoice in the freedoms that we have.
It is wonderful that regardless of our political leanings, our ethnic backgrounds, educational or social standings, we can all come together to celebrate the fact that we are all Americans.
My chest swells with pride. Â I hope yours does too!